Serb Natlfed

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Serbian finance
  • Serbian banks
  • Serbian economy
  • Serbian loans
  • Financial affairs

Serb Natlfed

Header Banner

Serb Natlfed

  • Home
  • Serbian finance
  • Serbian banks
  • Serbian economy
  • Serbian loans
  • Financial affairs
Financial affairs
Home›Financial affairs›CFPB Overcomes Payday Loan Rule Challenge | Goodwin

CFPB Overcomes Payday Loan Rule Challenge | Goodwin

By Corey Owens
October 7, 2021
0
0


On August 31, 2021, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas issued a notice maintaining the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) rule regulating payday loans. Community Financial Services Association of America, LTD., Et al. v. CFPB, Case No.1: 18-CV-00295 (WD TX.) (Community v. CFPB).

As a reminder, on November 17, 2017, the CFPB had issued the rule “on salary, vehicle title and certain high-cost installment loans” (rule). The rule included an underwriting provision, which prohibits lenders from making secured loans “without reasonably determining that consumers will have the capacity to repay the loans” and a payment provision, which prohibits some lenders from attempting to opt out. a consumer’s account after two failed withdrawal attempts without further authorization from the consumer. In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that the CFPB leadership structure was unconstitutional. Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, 140 S. Ct. 2183, 2192 (2020) (Seila Law). A few weeks after the Seila Law decision, the CFPB ratified the rule payments provision. 85 Fed. Reg. 4 1 905-02 (July 13, 2020).

Community c. CFPB was brought up on behalf of lenders and businesses affected by the Rule and ratification of the Rule. Community c. CFPB relied on Seila Law to present a direct challenge to the payment provision of the rule. Ultimately, the district court rejected all of the plaintiffs’ arguments as to why the payment arrangements should be set aside. The district court noted that the Supreme Court had ruled that “[Seila Law] maintenance to act does not mean that the actions taken by such an agent are void ab initio and must be undone. In addition, the district court ruled that the ratification of the rule was “valid and remedied the constitutional prejudice”. The plaintiffs also argued that one of its members had submitted a regulatory request to change the rule to exclude debit card payments from the payments provision, and the CFPB’s denial of this request was arbitrary. and capricious. The district court disagreed, finding that the CFPB had “made the rational connection between the facts found and the choice made when it chose to include” debit card payments in the rule. .


Related posts:

  1. AxiaMed Partners With CareCredit To Provide Integrated Payment Solutions For A Convenient And Streamlined Patient Experience
  2. Trends in digital payments to consumers in the United States 2020 – ResearchAndMarkets.com
  3. Visa against installment loan fintechs with API for issuers | Payments Source
  4. CareCredit Announces Expanded Strategic Partnership with National Veterinary Associates
Tagsinstallment loansunited states

Categories

  • Financial affairs
  • Serbian banks
  • Serbian economy
  • Serbian finance
  • Serbian loans

Resent Posts

  • The toppled Bulgarian government is a blow to EU enlargement hopes
  • CEE MARKETS-Crown stable as markets expect another big rate hike
  • CEE MARKETS-FX, stocks driven by global mood at risk
  • Synchrony Financial (NYSE:SYF) upgraded to buy on StockNews.com
  • EEX and CROPEX set to deploy Croatian electricity futures contracts in the first quarter of 2023

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions